Fault Hitting Post
Rules
tim gerg Asked 5 months ago
I saw a youtube recording of an old match with Timo Boll. He made a fantastic save as the ball hit the post. They ruled it a fault, but I was confused as to why. I don't know if the ball hit the net and then the post, or if it hit the net, then the table, then the post. It was not explained very well, and the explanation had to do with the intent of the rule, the actual situation was not addressed in the rules. Are you familiar with this clip?
Video Answer
We have filmed a video answer to this question. To watch it you need to be a premium member. By becoming a premium member you'll get online access to every PingSkills video we've ever made and learn techniques from Olympic Coach Alois Rosario and Olympian Jeff Plumb.
Alois Rosario Answered 5 months ago
Hi Tim,
I am not familiar with the clip but it may have been that the serve only hit the net post and then the net clamp part above the table so it didn't actually hit the surface of the table which is why it may have been ruled to be a Fault and not a Let.
Recommended Video
Can You Hide Your Serve? The Official Rule Explained
Are you allowed to hide your serve in table tennis? 🤔 Let’s break down the official rules and clear up any confusion! In this video, we explain:
✅ What the ITTF rules say about hiding your serve
✅ Why hidden serves are illegal and how umpires enforce the rule
✅ What you can (and can’t) do when serving in a match
Mastering a legal serve is key to fair play and improving your game. Watch now to make sure you’re not unintentionally breaking the rules! 🏓
Watch NowThoughts on this question (3)
Become a free member to post a comment about this question.
tim gerg Posted 4 months ago
I found the clip, relevant part is at about 46 seconds in and the rule explanation is at about 1:55 in. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9QulQI1K2Y
apparently, the ball hit the net, then the table and then the post before Timo was able to hit it. They said it is actually not exactly addressed in the rules but interpreted as a double net touch being a fault because he should have returned it between the net touches. Maybe you can explain it better so others can understand it clearly. The clip is poorly explained.
Hi Tim,
The ball is allowed to touch the net twice before you hit it. I don’t agree with the commentary in that video.
It is hard to see exactly what happened with that ball and it would have been even more difficult for the umpire in real time on the far side of the table.
Richard Carver Posted 2 weeks ago
Timo Boll's opponent should have been faulted as his shot never touched the table. The net support is definitely "part of the net".
Timo's shot is therefore not needed for him to win the point.