Strategy
I have played against both and my preference is to play the long pips as I find the anti plays differently. I often find the anti does not come onto you as much as the long pips. Can you help explain how you would play differently against these two rubbers?
Many thanks
Carol
Hi Carol,
The anti can be a little slower depending on the type of anti spin. Apart from that there is no real difference in how I would play against the two. I would try to play a backspin ball to the pimples or anti and then make an attacking stroke off the next ball.
In this video, we share 2 essential tips that can instantly improve your doubles play whether you're just starting out or already competing in matches.
🏓 Tip 1: Learn why playing more shots down the line helps your partner stay in position and how a well-timed cross-court attack can still surprise your opponents.
🏓 Tip 2: Discover the power of serving short and close to the centre line to reduce your opponents’ attacking options and give your team the advantage.
These small adjustments can make a big difference in your coordination, positioning, and success as a doubles pair.
Watch NowBecome a free member to post a comment about this question.
Ji-Soo Woo Posted 12 years ago
It's hard to compare the two when there is such a wide range of different LPs (not to mention the effect of sponge thicknesses) and antispins. As a very general rule of thumb, if the player is a chopper, I find it is easier for an antispin chopper to keep the ball on the table, but it's also easier for a looper to loop against antispin chops rather than LP chops. I think it is because (in my experience) antispin chops are more predictable...i.e. less spin deception. If the player is a close-to-the-table player, I find it is easier to hit the ball using antispin than LP. If you are playing against such a player, watch out for attacking strokes.
Basic rules (i.e. spin reversal properties, alternating backspin and topspin, feeding them no-spin balls, etc) are more or less the same.