Alois, can you weigh in your opinion on the hardbat vs spongebat debate? I know hardbat has been making a comeback, and have even watched some tournaments on youtube. There are those like the late Marty Reisman who swore by hardbat. Is it beneficial to learn both? Also, can a hardbat player beat a spongebat player? Should both be used in the same tournament or do you think there is a place for both but in separate forums?
I'd like your opinion because there is a lot of snobbery out there. The spongebat school says those that play hardbat have no skill and the hardcore hardbats say that that the speed of sponegbat has ruined table tennis. Oh boy! What do you think?
Mark Jung Posted 11 years ago Latest
I hate that hardbat (At least the USATT version) is like a historical reenactment: No long pips (or any rubbers not on the exclusive list), no nonwood blades, etc. The main reason I hate this is that there could be such a great sport there if the only thing removed was the sponge. Long pips, spongeless inverted (it's not that difficult to attach), medium pips, etc. would all see play, people could attack more, and the existing players wouldn't even really be at a gear disadvantage. But they just ban everything instead of the actual problem that hardbat was established to remove: the sponge.
Thoughts on this question (1)
1 comment from the PingSkills community.