Last updated 9 years ago
I have a general question on learning table tennis technique. When focussing on the fundamentals or when acquiring a new technique, is it better to isolate every aspect and focus on those one by one and integrate it back together later? Or could it be that by focussing on one aspect at a time, you neglect the other aspects and therefore don't get the "joints" right. Is the sum of the parts really equal the whole?
Two examples:
1) suppose I want to teach a beginner. Should I first explain grip, let them play with proper grip. Then stance, footwork, ball mechanics, full strokes etc etc? Or should I explain a full stroke including all those aspects and then correct all aspects together while observing?
2) I want to improve my own backhand topspin, which happens to have not enough elbow rotation and wrist rotation. Should I develop elbow rotation first, even into my competitive games and then start working on the wrist action, or should I try to improve both at the same time?
Hi Dieter,
The sum of the parts is much greater.
You can learn each stroke well but if you can’t combine them, then you will struggle in a match.
When you are referring to a single stroke, I think it is important to learn the whole stroke first. Then if you see small changes that can be made to a particular part of the stroke, you can make changes there.
We like to teach the start and finish which gets you to focus on the whole stroke as one. If you get from the start to the finish position smoothly you will have a good stroke. You can get too caught up with the smaller intricacies of a stroke and lose the whole feel of it.
Become a free member to post a comment about this question.
Dieter Verhofstadt Posted 9 years ago
Zooming in on start and end is indeed a great tool to cover the whole integration of all body joints and ball mechanics. Thanks!